January 22, 2018
Home | Podcast | Contact Nancy | LinksMedia | Constituency Map | Canada | Saskatchewan   

Legislative Report

18 January 2018

Opposition to Federal Carbon Tax

Every province in Canada has now imposed some version of the Trudeau carbon tax – every province except Saskatchewan.

Our made-in-Saskatchewan climate change plan will seriously address the challenge of climate change without a carbon tax. The NDP said we should "check with the feds" to see if that's OK.

We don't work for the federal government. We work for the people of Saskatchewan. The NDP may want the Trudeau carbon tax in Saskatchewan, but we're going to stand up for this province.

The Trudeau government has now released a 236-page draft bill to impose its federal carbon tax on provinces that don’t have one. Saskatchewan Justice is reviewing the draft federal legislation.

We continue to believe that the federal proposal to impose a carbon tax backstop on top of provincial climate change plans is a significant overreach by the Government of Canada and is open to Constitutional challenge.

If the Trudeau government decides to try and impose a carbon tax on Saskatchewan families and businesses, our government will continue our fight to prevent that from happening, including taking court action if necessary.

Creating a Climate for Strong Economic Growth

Ten years ago, our newly-elected Saskatchewan Party government set out to reverse years of decline under the NDP by creating one of the strongest investment climates in Canada.

During a decade of our plan in action, Saskatchewan has added over 60,000 more jobs and maintained among the strongest job and wage growth in all of Canada.

This period of exceptional growth has benefited our province in a variety of ways, including new and exciting opportunities to build careers and contribute to our communities.

We know that there have been challenges for our province’s economy and that has put pressure on businesses, jobs, families, and the province’s finances. We will continue to help diversify our economy by supporting growth in value-added production, innovation and technology.

Our government has also passed amendments to The Income Tax Act, extending the lower 2 per cent tax rate to small business income. This is going to provide greater incentive to hire more workers and invest in new capital. These changes build on our 2011 decision to reduce the small business tax rate from 4.5% to 2%, saving small businesses over half a billion dollars by the end of 2017.

Saskatchewan’s economy continues to show signs of momentum with 5,000 new jobs in December and 17% growth in building permits over the past year.

Saskatchewan’s 12 per cent corporate income tax rate continues to be competitive and among the lowest in the country, further enhancing our province’s significant advantages when attracting new investment and jobs.

Saskatchewan residents will also continue to benefit from lower provincial Personal Income Tax rates this year, which dropped half a percentage point effective July 1, 2017. Saskatchewan Personal Income Tax rates will drop by another half point on July 1, 2019.

An RBC Economics Provincial Outlook also projects Saskatchewan to lead the country with economic growth of 2.7 per cent for both 2018 and 2019. With a strengthening economy and our population continuing to grow, Saskatchewan is beginning a second decade of growth.

Regulation of Cannabis Sales in Saskatchewan

Recently, our government announced how legal cannabis will be sold in Saskatchewan.

The federal government has established very aggressive timelines for the legalization of cannabis and our government is being diligent to ensure the sale and regulation of cannabis in Saskatchewan strikes a balance between public safety and access for consumers.

The Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming Authority (SLGA) will be issuing approximately 60 cannabis retail permits to private operators in up to 40 municipalities and First Nations communities.

The initial allocation for retail store permits will be in communities with a population of at least 2,500 people, with additional permits being allocated to larger communities. Municipalities and First Nations will have the option to opt out of having a cannabis store in their community if they choose.

Wholesaling and retailing of cannabis will be conducted by the private sector and regulated by SLGA.

Cannabis retailers will be required to establish standalone storefront operations, with the option to also operate an online store. Cannabis stores will be limited to selling cannabis, cannabis accessories, and other ancillary items. Stores must also have the ability to track and report cannabis inventory to help ensure consumers have access to safe, legal product from regulated wholesalers.

Other details will be finalized over the coming weeks with a decision on the minimum age to be made later this spring.

If you have a question about this Legislative Report or any other matter, just Contact Nancy.

Past Legislative Reports

Farewell to Brad Wall
(7 December 2017)

From Hansard - 7 December 2017

To view this section on video, click here, and start play at 11:55:50 AM.

Farewell to Brad Wall

Hon. Ms. Heppner: — Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I was trying to think of what to say today. And I have these tiny moments where I have a sense of humour and I thought maybe I could tap some of that, but every time I sat down none of that came out. So I appreciate the fact that others have been able to inject some humour into the discussion today. But I’m going to speak from the heart and hope I get through it.

I don’t actually remember the first time I met Brad — I can’t look at you when I do this — but I remember my first day in this Chamber. I was elected in a by-election in March of 2007 and was sworn in. And within, I don’t know, minutes, I was asked to be up in question period. And the file that was given me was to defend and be a voice for the victims of Murdoch Carriere, which was a daunting task. And additionally daunting is the minister that I had to ask questions of was Pat Atkinson, who we all know was formidable in this Chamber.

And to have that kind of confidence instilled in me . . . And Brad didn’t really know me. He obviously knew my dad. He didn’t really know me. To be able to take on that file — and it was more than a file — and to be the voice for those women who had no voice was humbling. I recently was going through some boxes in my office and came across cards and notes that I had received from them afterwards, thanking me, thanking me for being that voice. But I was only able to do that because of the tenacity that you had and the leadership that you provided on that file.

It was the right thing for the right reason. It wasn’t about politics. We’ve had this discussion since then just to make sure that we were doing it correctly. And then after winning in 2007 and moving into government, we carried on because it was the right thing for the right reasons and offered a formal apology to those women and additional compensation, not that any of that could make up for what they had been through. But it was such an amazing lesson for me as a new MLA.

Well I love politics. I love question period and the give-and-take in this place, and hopefully you give more than you take. That was such an amazing moment for me to start my career off with that, so I want to thank you for your confidence in me in letting me be that voice and being an example of doing the right things for the right reasons.

I also want to thank you for having a family-first policy. As a lot of the members here will know, my little family has probably faced more than their fair . . . of challenges in the last few years. I had asked to be out of cabinet a few years ago so I could spend more time with my girls and that request was met with such amazing grace from you, and a genuine care and understanding of what we were going through and that my girls needed me at home. And there was never any judgment. This job always comes second, always comes second. And as important as it is, it is not the most important thing.

This is going to be the tough part. In the last ten and a half years here, I have never once professed to be able to speak on behalf of my dad. I’m going to try. And just to make sure that I wasn’t offside on this, I phoned Mother Heppner earlier this week to ask her permission and to run past her the things that I wanted to say just to make sure because I figured if anybody has the right to be offended, it would be my mom. And mom said, you go get ’em; that’s exactly what dad would want. And she passes on her love for you and you know that if she were here, she’d give you a great, big, squishy Mother Heppner hug and hold you up. And so on behalf of Mother Heppner, I wanted to pass that on to you.

I know what my dad would say if he were here, knowing the man that he was. First of all he would commend you on being a man of integrity. Integrity in the job that we do here doesn’t mean that you always get it right. It doesn’t mean that you’re blameless. It means that you enter into the actions that you take with sincerity and honesty and that when you make mistakes, you apologize. And we know that you have done that. And so he would commend you for that.

He would commend you for your humility. My dad was a very proud man, but he was not an arrogant man. And I see the same qualities in you. I see you cringe when people call you Premier Wall because you just want to be Brad to all of us. Whether inside this Chamber or outside this Chamber, that is the most important thing that you have surrounded yourself by is this humility, and people see it. They know that. That’s why they want to be your friend. That’s why they want to go for coffee with you. That’s why they want to fly out from BC and see you. They want to know just Brad the way that we do. We know that our time in this place is fleeting. The names on our doors, they’re removable for a reason because they are not long-lasting. And you know that.

Thirdly and maybe most importantly, he would commend you for your continued . . . to be continued to be offended by the use of bad grammar, propositions at the end of sentences, and the use of “irregardless” which we know is not a word, and we don’t know why people keep using it. So him being a former English teacher, he would certainly appreciate that.

The last visit I had with dad at RUH in Saskatoon before he moved into palliative care, Brad and I actually showed up at the same time. And it was, I think, one of the first times I’d actually had a conversation with you because I had been out in Ottawa. And so I let you have time with dad and I’m sure you talked about politics because dad was still looking forward to the 2007 election and he actually wanted to be Speaker. That was his plan. And so I let you have your time, and then I went in afterwards and had a chat with dad and again talking about politics. And at the very end of our conversations, one of the last things he ever said to me, with that smile on his face, he said “That man will be premier next year and he will do a good job.”

So on behalf of my dad who never doubted your ability, if he were here today he would say, I’m proud of you. Job well done.


Back to 2017/18 Legislative Session

P3s Working for Saskatchewan



Generation v2.54 Site design ©2018 Kontakt Consulting. Web-Hosting by Metric-Hosting Ltd.

All contents are ©2018 Nancy Heppner, MLA Martensville-Warman.

This site is best viewed with a resolution set to at least 800x600 using Internet Explorer 6 or higher.